The ACORN Trial- Cefepime vs. Piperacillin-Tazobactam

Good Evening Everyone, 

Happy Monday! Today I’ll be discussing the ACORN (Antibiotic Control of Renal Outcomes) Trial. Link for full study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2810592

Purpose:

- To determine whether the use of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam increases the occurrence of AKI or neurologic dysfunction in adults hospitalized for acute infection 

Rationale: 

- Hospitalized adults with acute infection are often initiated on antibiotics providing:  

1) MRSA coverage: typically vancomycin

2) Anti-pseudominal coverage: typically cefepime OR piperacillin-tazobactam

-Bacterial coverage: Similar efficacy in both cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam has been established 

-Side Effects: AKI is a known side effect of piperacillin-tazobactam especially in combination with vancomycin; neurologic dysfunction is a known side effect of cefepime 

Study Details: 

- Conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between Nov 2021 - October 2022 

- Single-center, randomized control trial (N=2511)

          - 7% ED patients, sepsis most common diagnosis

- Inclusion criteria: Adults 18 and over in the ED or MICU 

- Exclusion criteria: Medication allergy, treatment with anti-pseudomonal coverage in last 7 days, determined by clinician that one of the treatment options was more optimal for the patient 

- Two experimental groups: Randomized to either cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam within 12 hours of hospital stay 

- Primary outcome: Highest Stage of AKI or death by Day 14

- Secondary outcomes: Incidence of AKI at Day 14; Number of days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days 

Results: 

-No statistically significant difference in primary outcome when comparing cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam (AKI stage or death by day 14) 

-Piperacillin-tazobactam is not associated with increased AKI or death (even when given in combination with vancomycin) 

-Cefepime is associated with increased delirium and coma when compared to piperacillin-tazobactam

Conclusion:  

-In adult patients hospitalized with sepsis, since cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam have similar efficacy, barring contraindications, piperacillin-tazobactam is the preferred agent for anti-pseudomonal coverage as it is not associated with worse neurologic outcomes 

Strengths: 

-Large randomized control trial with sound methodology 

-Addressed clinically important question surrounding two antibiotics commonly used in adults with sepsis 

-About 50% of enrolled patients were already with known kidney injury at baseline; thus, a study with a population that was more prone to kidney injury showing no worsening of kidney injury by either antibiotic demonstrates the strength of the conclusion     

Limitations: 

-Single center study limits generalizability 

-No blinding in study which could affect subjective physician assessments of neurologic status 

-Clinicians could exclude patients from enrollment if determined that one antibiotic choice was more optimal for the patient- those who suspected potential renal injury from piperacillin-tazobactam may have excluded patients who would have otherwise developed worsening kidney injury, which could have altered the primary outcome

-Short overall treatment duration of antibiotics that varied for every patient based on clinician decision-making (median 3 days), which may have been too short of a duration to allow for development of AKI or neurologic decline 

Every institution has its own protocols for antibiotic coverage for hospital-acquired infections, and these protocols should be adhered to. If anyone has further thoughts or opinions on this subject, please do share! 

Best,

Lekha Reddy

 ·