How Much Do CT Scans Increase Malignancy Risk?

Good Evening Everyone, 

One of our most utilized tests in the emergency department is the CT scan. CT scan use in the emergency department has risen disproportionately (330%) in comparison to the increase in ED visits (30%) between 1996 and 2007. In the back of most EM physician’s minds is typically whether radiation is necessary or not, particularly when a patient is young. Today, I’ll be discussing circumstances that have led to rising CT scan usage, evidence for projected malignancy risk, and interventions to address CT overuse.

What are the circumstances causing increased CT usage? 

A systematic review in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine in 2018 examined studies between 1998-2017 and identified determinants associated with increased CT usage in the emergency department. 

  • Increase in defensive medicine practice by physicians 

  • Trauma patients that are transferred from a local ED to a level 1 trauma center are often re-imaged

  • Lack of integration between electronic medical records when patients are transferred between EDs 

  • Rising elderly patient population with more medical comorbidities 

  • ED crowding resulting in less time at the bedside to educate patients on risks of radiation from CT scans 

How much do CT scans increase the risk of malignancy?

A landmark study published in JAMA Internal Medicine in April 2025 established future risk of malignancy with the current rise in CT scan usage using a validated predictive radiation risk tool developed by the National Cancer Institute. 

  • In the study, 61.5 million patients underwent 93 million CT scans from 2023-2024 with the following demographics: 

    • 25.7 million (4.2%) children

    • 58.9 million (95.8%) adults

    • 32.6 million (53%) female

    • 28.9 million (47%) male 

  • There could be 103,000 projected lifetime cancers from radiation-induced malignancy (could account for 5% for all future cancer)

    • Higher CT utilization in adults accounted for most projected radiation-induced cancers (93,000)

      • The CT Abdomen Pelvis is projected to be the cause of the majority of future cancers (37%) followed by the CT Chest (32%) in adults 

      • Most common projected malignancies in adults include lung cancer, colon cancer, leukemia, and bladder cancer

    • Radiation risk is higher in children due to increased physiologic sensitivity to radiation, but projected cancer numbers are lower compared to adults (9700) 

      • CT Head contributes to the largest number of cancers in children (53%), greatest at age <1 with risk decreasing with age 

      • Most common projected malignancies in children include thyroid, lung, and breast cancer 

    • In female patients, lung and thyroid cancer are predicted to have a higher incidence and breast cancer is the second most common projected cancer from CT scan overuse

Interventions to Address CT Overuse In the ED: 

A 2022 systematic review in the Annals of Emergency Medicine identified successful and less successful interventions to address CT overuse in the ED. 

  • Successful interventions without compromising patient safety:

    • diagnostic pathways

    • alternative imaging options

    • involving consultants early 

  • Less successful interventions not backed by evidence: 

    • family/patient education

    • passively disseminated guidelines

    • clinical decision support tools 

All in all, the information above may not come as a surprise to many of us, but it provides us with concrete evidence demonstrating that CT overuse in the ED may have serious consequences for our population (103,000 predicted cancer diagnoses accounting for 5% of all future cancers). Consider the data when ordering your next CT scan and the suggested interventions above so that we may mitigate malignancy risk in the future. 

Best,

Lekha Reddy 

 · 

Blood is thicker than water

Hello all, this week's video of the week is a spooky bloody one inspired by this past Halloween weekend! 

Brought to you by Dr. Gabriela Hernandez and Dr. Victor Wong!

ED Course

61 y/o female with PMHx of HLD presents to the ED for worsening suprapubic pain x5 months. Several months ago she had an MRI which revealed free fluid in her pelvis.  States that she had an outpatient ultrasound done 4 days ago which revealed persistent fluid in the pelvis and she was sent home with pain medication and antibiotics. Associated symptoms are subjective fever, pelvic pain with walking, and dysuria. Reports history of C-section x1 and D&C. Denies nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, chest pain, vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge.

Ultrasound

In this still image from clip 1, there is some free fluid around a distended uterus that is filled with heterogenic complex fluid that may be a mass or coagulated blood.

In the 2 attached clips, clip 1 shows a sagittal distended uterus with complex fluid, likely blood clots with trace amount of free fluid in the pelvis. Clip 2 shows the transverse view of the uterus again with complex fluid.

Formal ultrasound obtained by the team revealed: Markedly distended uterus containing complex fluid. Considerations include endometrial carcinoma vs. extensive blood clot. Possibly infection/pyometrium in the appropriate clinical setting.

Conclusion:

OBGYN consulted. They recommended obtaining tumor markers and close follow-up with her outpatient GYN.

Learning Points:

Appearance of blood on ultrasound can be variable depending on age of clot

  • Acute, fresh blood

    • Often hypoechoic or anechoic, may resemble simple fluid early on

    • Can have internal echoes that swirl with probe pressure

  • Organizing / clotted blood:

    • Becomes heterogeneous, with low-to-medium echogenicity

    • Often appears as avascular, nonshadowing, ill-defined material

    • Can seem like a “soft tissue–like” mass that lacks internal vascularity on color Doppler

    • Echogenicity tends to increase as the clot ages and fibrin organizes

  • Chronic clot:

    • Can become retracted and hyperechoic, sometimes mimicking a fibroid or retained products

References:

Patel, S. J., Feldstein, V. A., & Filly, R. A. (2021). Sonographic differentiation of retained products of conception, blood clot, and intrauterine masses: Diagnostic challenges and clinical implications. Emergency Radiology, 28(3), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01865-6

Radiopaedia contributors. (2025). Blood clot (ultrasound). Radiopaedia.org. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/blood-clot-ultrasound

Nassiri, S., & Lerman, J. (2017). Ultrasound features of pelvic hematomas: Recognizing blood in disguise. Ultrasound Quarterly, 33(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000265



 · 

TWIST Score for Testicular Torsion

I recently came across a risk stratification tool for testicular torsion called the TWIST (Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion) Score. I am sharing more information regarding its purpose, scoring, validity, and utility in the emergency department for patients with acute testicular pain. 

TWIST (Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion) Score

Testicular Torsion

- Testicular torsion is a surgical emergency and requires prompt intervention (time = testicle, people)

- It is a clinical diagnosis and definitive management can be delayed by testicular ultrasound, especially in lower resource settings 


Purpose 

- The TWIST score was originally developed by urologist Dr. Barbosa at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Sao Paolo in Sao Paolo, Brazil

- It was created to: 

      - Risk stratify for testicular torsion in children with acute scrotal pain

      - Reduce the need for testicular ultrasound, ultimately reducing delay to definitive management (OR) in patients with true testicular torsion 


Scoring (MD Calc) 


Validity

- In pediatrics: A prospective study published by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine in 2021 examined the validity of the TWIST Score when utilized by pediatric emergency medicine providers. Males age 3 months to 18 years old were included (N=258, 19 diagnosed with testicular torsion). A high-risk TWIST score (7) was found to have 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value for testicular torsion. 

- In adults: A prospective study published by the creator of the TWIST Score in 2021 examined the validity of the TWIST score when used by non-expert providers (aka non-urologists) in adults. Males who presented to a tertiary care hospital were included (N=68, 34 diagnosed with testicular torsion). A TWIST score of 5 (high risk) showed a positive predictive value of 90%, and a TWIST score of 6-7 (high risk) had a positive predictive value of 100%. A TWIST score of <2 (low risk) had 100% negative predictive value. 

- A Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis published in 2022 compared various studies (adult and pediatric patients included) analyzing different testicular torsion risk stratification scores (N=1060, 199 diagnosed with testicular torsion). It demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% in low risk patients (TWIST score 0-2) and a specificity of 97% in high risk patients (TWIST score 5-7). Per 100 acute scrotum patients, there was a 1.6/100 missed torsion rate with the TWIST score. The study found that the TWIST score is the most reliable current risk stratification tool for testicular torsion and effective for widespread adoption. 


Utility of the TWIST Score in the emergency department 

- The TWIST score is a validated and reliable tool for risk stratifying for testicular torsion in adult and pediatric patients with acute scrotal pain 

- In high-resource settings, the TWIST score may be useful to advocate for immediate urologic evaluation and definitive management as opposed to waiting for a testicular ultrasound, as delay may result in permanent testicular damage and fertility issues 

- In low-resource settings, the TWIST score may be useful for the following scenarios (i.e freestanding ED / ultrasound is unavailable / urologic consultation is unavailable): 

           - Expedite decision-making regarding whether or not to transfer a patient out for urologic evaluation 

           - Guide decision-making when clinical findings are equivocal on whether or not to obtain or transfer for a testicular ultrasound

- Institution-specific protocols exist for testicular torsion and should be followed

- Always err on the side of caution. Remember, time = testicle!  

 ·