Hello Everyone,
Today I’ll be discussing whether the order of antibiotic administration in patients requiring multiple antibiotics matters. In patients who are critically ill with concern for bloodstream infections, two types of antibiotics are given as standard of care: 1) anti-pseudomonal / broad-spectrum beta-lactam coverage (typically cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam) and 2) anti-MRSA coverage (typically vancomycin). A 2021 study was conducted to determine whether the order of administration of these antibiotics matters- spoiler: it makes a difference.
Link to study: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/75/1/98/6381106?login=false
Rationale:
-Early antibiotic administration in sepsis has been proven to reduce mortality. Mortality increases with each hourly delay in antibiotic administration.
-Early in the ED course, patients often have limited IV access. If multiple antibiotics are required, there is no established preferential order of administration.
-Vancomycin takes 1 hour to administer. Cefepime and pipericillin-tazobactam take 15-30 minutes each to administer. Given the hour-to-hour increase in mortality with antibiotic delays, these timings could be significant if one antibiotic is preferential.
-Theoretically, gram negative bacteria may cause more serious infection due to exotoxin release and profound inflammatory response. Broad-spectrum anti-pseudomonal antibiotics may provide better coverage early in infection course over anti-MRSA coverage, which covers for a more narrow spectrum of pathogens.
Clinical Question:
Does the sequence of antibiotic administration in patients with suspected blood stream infection have an effect on 48-hr and 7-day mortality?
Study Details:
-Multicenter retrospective observational study from July 2016-2020 in Baltimore, MD
-N = 3376 patients total
-Inclusion: Patients older than 13, all suspected blood stream infections
-Exclusion: Patients who did not receive at least one dose of antibiotic within the first 6 hours of treatment, overlapping antibiotics, previously on antibiotics, contaminant organisms in blood cultures, and non-bacterial organisms in blood cultures
-Groups: Beta lactam first (including cephalosporin, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, or monobactams) vs. Vancomycin first
Discussion/Conclusion
-Administration of a beta-lactam antibiotic prior to vancomycin is protective against 48-hr and 7-day mortality (reduced odds of 7-day mortality by 52%)
-Strengths: large sample size, generalizability
-Limitations: retrospective study, non-randomized
-Recommendations: further prospective studies can provide additional evidence
Next time when ordering antibiotics for a critically ill patient with concern for blood stream infection, based on this study, consider the sequence of administration as well (and communicate with nursing!). Prioritizing beta lactam administration may significantly impact mortality for our patients. It’s a simple step, but it can make a big difference.
Best,
Lekha Reddy
- EMS
- Trauma
- POCUS
- Procedures
- Cardiovascular
- Ultrasound
- Infectious Disease
- Respiratory / Pulm
- Obstetrics / Gynecology
- Orthopedics
- Special Topics
- Wellness
- Critical Care
- Pediatrics
- Toxicology
- Endocrine
- Airway
- EKG
- Medications
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
- Dental / ENT
- Ophthalmology
- Environmental
- Medical Legal
- Dermatology
- Psychiatry
- Gastroenterology
- Hematology / Oncology
- Nephrology / Renal
- Radiology
- Urology
- Wound Care
- Admin
- Nerve Blocks
- Vascular
- EM
- Emergency
- Emergency Medicine
- Benzodiazepines
- DVT
- Foreign Body
- Anal Fissure
- Bupivacaine
- Corneal Foreign Body
- Dialysis Catheter
- Diverticulitis
- Finance
- Gabapentin
- Galea Laceration
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
Pediatric vs. Adult Trauma Assessment
Good Morning Everyone,
Given our new pediatric trauma protocols at MMC Main, I am providing key differences in the pediatric trauma assessment compared to adults (note: this is not a comprehensive review of pediatric ATLS). While there is significant overlap in the evaluation of adult and pediatric traumatic injuries, there are a few key differences in physiology and anatomy that must be understood to properly evaluate and stabilize a pediatric trauma patient.
Major Differences between Adult and Pediatric Trauma
Weight-based dosing: Utilize Broslow tape (located in Resus 51) to ensure efficient medication dosing and delivery
Allow parents at the bedside during resuscitation to allow for patient comfort and provide explanation of the resuscitation
Consider non-accidental trauma when history is vague or inconsistent
*Pedi STAT is a mobile application providing information on normal vitals, RSI meds, ETT sizing, agitation, burns, PALS, fluid/blood resuscitation, pressors, seizure, GCS, pain management, etc. Great for quick reference!
Airway
If there is a concern for airway stability, below is a diagram detailing the differences in pediatric airway anatomy.
How to Optimize: The anatomical differences are adjusted for by elevating the shoulders and backs of young infants/children with a rolled towel or sheet for optimal alignment.
Cricothyrotomy: If indicated, needle cricothyrotomy is for children <10-12 years due to small size of the cricothyroid membrane. Children older than 10-12 years may have an open cricothyrotomy.
Laryngoscope sizing:
0-2 years: Miller/Mac 1
2-8 years: Miller/Mac 2
> 8 years: Miller/Mac 3
Endotracheal Tube Sizing: Cuffed = (age / 4) + 3.5; Uncuffed = (age / 4) + 4
Endotracheal Tube Advancement: Endotracheal tube size x 3 = Lip Line location
Breathing
Pediatric patients have shorter safe apnea times and more sharp O2 desaturations due to differences in physiologic reserve and oxygen consumption.
Oxygenation / Ventilation
Non-rebreather
<2 year old: 4L/min
2-12 year old: 6L/min
>12: 8L/min
Bag-valve mask ventilation can cause gastric insufflation in children which can quickly compromise ventilation- NG/OG tube should be placed quickly
NG tube size = uncuffed endotracheal tube size x 2
What to do for pediatric Tension Pneumothorax:
ATLS recommends Needle decompression in 2nd intercostal space at midclavicular line (differs from adults)
Chest tube size = 3-4 x uncuffed endotracheal tube size
Circulation
Hemorrhagic shock: Hypotension is a late finding in pediatric hypovolemic shock. Rely on tachycardia or clinical signs of poor perfusion to direct resuscitation.
Lower end of normal systolic BP for various age ranges:
0-28 days: <60
28 days - 1 year: <70
1 year - 10 years: 70 + (age x 2)
> 10 years: 90
IO Access: Optimal locations include anterior tibia, distal femur, and medial malleolus if IV access unsuccessful
Disability
Consider using GCS or AVPU score to assess for disability
AVPU: Alert, Verbal, Painful, Unresponsive
A score of V or lower correlates to GCS </= 9
Exposure
Pediatric patients have higher risk of hypothermia and coagulopathy due to high metabolic demand and surface area: volume ratio. External warming matters!
Laboratory Studies
Not always indicated in children
For patients who are unstable or with severe injuries: Type and Screen, VBG, CBC, BMP, LFT, coagulation factors
Consider BGM for AMS, pregnancy test for females of reproductive age, UA for hematuria
ECG and troponin if concern for blunt cardiac injury
Imaging Indications
E-FAST is recommended in evaluation of an unstable child following trauma
CXR / Pelvic XRs only indicated if clinical concern for pulmonary or pelvic injuries
CT Scans should be ordered with discretion due to portended malignancy risk from radiation. Consider utilizing risk stratification tools such as PECARN for head trauma. Consult with the peds ED, trauma team and/or PICU colleagues if questions arise.
Summary of formulas (can also be found in Pedi STAT):
Laryngoscope sizing:
0-2 years: Miller/Mac 1
2-8 years: Miller/Mac 2
> 8 years: Miller/Mac 3
Endotracheal Tube Sizing: Cuffed = (age / 4) + 3.5; Uncuffed = (age / 4) + 4
Endotracheal Tube Advancement (lip line) = uncuffed endotracheal tube size x 3
Chest tube size = uncuffed endotracheal tube size x 4
NG tube size = uncuffed endotracheal tube size x 2
Lower end of normal systolic BP for various age ranges:
0-28 days: <60
28 days - 1 year: <70
1 year - 10 years: 70 + (age x 2)
> 10 years: 90
I hope this review was helpful! Any additional pearls / thoughts are welcome as we continue to transition to our new pediatric ED protocols.
Best,
Lekha Reddy
The ACORN Trial- Cefepime vs. Piperacillin-Tazobactam
Good Evening Everyone,
Happy Monday! Today I’ll be discussing the ACORN (Antibiotic Control of Renal Outcomes) Trial. Link for full study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2810592
Purpose:
- To determine whether the use of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam increases the occurrence of AKI or neurologic dysfunction in adults hospitalized for acute infection
Rationale:
- Hospitalized adults with acute infection are often initiated on antibiotics providing:
1) MRSA coverage: typically vancomycin
2) Anti-pseudominal coverage: typically cefepime OR piperacillin-tazobactam
-Bacterial coverage: Similar efficacy in both cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam has been established
-Side Effects: AKI is a known side effect of piperacillin-tazobactam especially in combination with vancomycin; neurologic dysfunction is a known side effect of cefepime
Study Details:
- Conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between Nov 2021 - October 2022
- Single-center, randomized control trial (N=2511)
- 7% ED patients, sepsis most common diagnosis
- Inclusion criteria: Adults 18 and over in the ED or MICU
- Exclusion criteria: Medication allergy, treatment with anti-pseudomonal coverage in last 7 days, determined by clinician that one of the treatment options was more optimal for the patient
- Two experimental groups: Randomized to either cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam within 12 hours of hospital stay
- Primary outcome: Highest Stage of AKI or death by Day 14
- Secondary outcomes: Incidence of AKI at Day 14; Number of days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days
Results:
-No statistically significant difference in primary outcome when comparing cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam (AKI stage or death by day 14)
-Piperacillin-tazobactam is not associated with increased AKI or death (even when given in combination with vancomycin)
-Cefepime is associated with increased delirium and coma when compared to piperacillin-tazobactam
Conclusion:
-In adult patients hospitalized with sepsis, since cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam have similar efficacy, barring contraindications, piperacillin-tazobactam is the preferred agent for anti-pseudomonal coverage as it is not associated with worse neurologic outcomes
Strengths:
-Large randomized control trial with sound methodology
-Addressed clinically important question surrounding two antibiotics commonly used in adults with sepsis
-About 50% of enrolled patients were already with known kidney injury at baseline; thus, a study with a population that was more prone to kidney injury showing no worsening of kidney injury by either antibiotic demonstrates the strength of the conclusion
Limitations:
-Single center study limits generalizability
-No blinding in study which could affect subjective physician assessments of neurologic status
-Clinicians could exclude patients from enrollment if determined that one antibiotic choice was more optimal for the patient- those who suspected potential renal injury from piperacillin-tazobactam may have excluded patients who would have otherwise developed worsening kidney injury, which could have altered the primary outcome
-Short overall treatment duration of antibiotics that varied for every patient based on clinician decision-making (median 3 days), which may have been too short of a duration to allow for development of AKI or neurologic decline
Every institution has its own protocols for antibiotic coverage for hospital-acquired infections, and these protocols should be adhered to. If anyone has further thoughts or opinions on this subject, please do share!
Best,
Lekha Reddy